.
| ryan5 says : Just finished No Country for Old Men, and i must say it was brilliant, but the ending was an anti-climax. I mean the climax was building and building, with the mexicans and Anton after Llwelyn at the El Paso hotel. Then suddenly Llwelyn is killed. WTF? I thought it was way too brief and basically ruined a brilliant film. I was keying up for a battle of wits between the protagonist (llwelyn) and the antagonist (Anton) for the ending. I guess that would have been to predictable, but i reckon it would have been better. The ending where Anton is in the car Crash is basically pointless, if anything it brings about the possibility of a second film. Anyway i thought it was very good, but the anti climax ending ruined it. I still give it an 8-9/10, |
| InfinityZero says : I also love Tarkovsky. Watch Ivan's Childhood--it is absolutely great and the cinematography is very ahead of its time. |
| InfinityZero says : At least No Country for Old Men is better than the fucking book. Cormac McCarthy is one of the most overhyped writers ever. Anyway, blame him for the limp-dicked ending. I personally had no problem with the protagonist Dying when he did, but maybe because I'm a sucker for gritty realism. What I didn't like about the ending (again, referring to the book) was the long-winded psuedo philosohpical speech by the sheriff who had absolutely no personality. The movie was good, but I personally think There Will Be Blood (the other movie vying for best film 2007) was infinitely better. |