People seem to think that St Anger is a Nu Metal or just Plain Rock album.
 
What do you think

---

I remember having fun once, it was terrible...

it is a fucking ugly motherfucking album , it is not metal at all , and fuck Metallica after 1988
thanks

---

Keep on Thrashing

Thrash Metal consists of a lot of solos.
 
There are no solos in St Anger.
 
Problem solved!

---

I do album art for bands! Send me a Message or email [email protected] for more info. My website: http://curtisbotham.weebly.com/

All you it's not metal dick heads make me laugh. Of course it's metal stupid.

---

My Last FM Profile
Xbox Live Gamertag SnakeBiteKiss

Neither. I think it's more Hard Rock

---

i think it was just really awful Thrash Metal

---

Shit yeah!... Shit no, No One likes shit!

St. Anger is PURE Nu Metal
 
A lot of people think ANYTHING speedy is Thrash, they're wrong!
 
Metallica have NEVER been rock, their first 4 albums are all Thrash
anything after that is just Heavy Metal (false Heavy Metal) except St Anger.

---

There is no such thing as good and Evil, only stupidity.

I voted other, for you know, it being not music. Or at least horribly done hard rock. St. Anger wasn't even good by any standards. Lyrically it was bullshit. Musically everything was the same.

...And Justice For All was and still is a Masterpiece according to me... but then Metallica started to suck.

---

Last.fm: Mercenarion

St. Anger... hm... well i don't think it's Absolute shit, and i would say that it was a Nu Metal album... almost has an industrial feel to it IMO, lol

---

"Raise your swords up High!,
See The Black Birds Fly!,
Let them hear your rage!,
Show no fear!......Attack!!!!!"
- Amon Amarth, Panzerjager

Amen to that, no more comment to it.St Anger was awfully bad but I dont see any link with other Nu Metal shit bands like Slipknot, Linkin Park, SOAD or Korn.